House Restructuring Bill Lacks Restructuring

After years of struggling to restructure our outdated form of government, the House finally passed a bill aimed at giving more authority to executive branch. The newly formed Department of Administration will included the Energy Office, CIO, Procurement, Human Resources, and General Services.

I’m sure these are highly important offices to running our bureaucracy, but this is certainly not what a lot of Republicans (and even some Democrats) were hoping to see changed. The fact of the matter is the Budget & Control Board should not exist in any form resembling its current structure. The legislature is constitutionally designed to be woefully inefficient. This inefficiency is not necessarily a bad thing. It prevents bad bills from being passed. But when executive decisions are being made with the input of the legislature, it creates a woefully unresponsive and wasteful form of government. This cost taxpayers millions of dollars each year, and leads to serious failures in the bureaucratic structure.

The most serious consequence of having a Budget & Control Board is complete lack of responsibility given to any single elected official when serious failures in the government occur. The most recent example of this was the series of incidents involving members of the South Carolina Highway Patrol. The Department of Public Safety remains under the control of the Budget & Control Board despite being a cabinet agency. Gov. Sanford was able to get senior officials at DPS to resign from there positions, but the responsibility for these failures rested upon bureaucrats rather than elected officials.

Ultimately, the buck must stop with an elected official so that voters can make informed decisions about the candidates seeking to represent our best interests. While the Budget & Control Board is composed of five elected officials, citizens will not be able to decide whether to hold the Governor, Comptroller General, State Treasurer, Senate Finance Chairman, or House Ways & Means Chairman accountable. This complete lack of accountability is fundamental failure in our government that must be addressed by meaningful reform.

Moving these offices to the executive branch is a first step in the right direction, but the negligible effects of moving these relatively minor offices fails to address the aforementioned grievances. Members of the legislature will have to relinquish some of their influence in order to bring meaningful reform. I would like to take this opportunity to remind them that their purpose is to serve the best interests of South Carolinians rather than clinging on to their power, which has proven to be a corruptive force in government time after time.

7 Responses to “House Restructuring Bill Lacks Restructuring”

  1. Wondering Says:

    The problem with restructuring is that Mark Sanford wants it.His total lack of leadership is what Tom Peters refers to in his quote:

    “Leaders don’t create followers, they create more leaders.”

    Sanford has a pail full of drones that follow his ideologically pure libertarian drivel, but no leaders to make progress with the principles of his mantra.

    So it is indisputable that no major changes will be made in our government because Mark Sanford cannot lead. Which of course reminds me of another quote:

    “I suppose that leadership at one time meant muscle; but today it means getting along with people.” ~Indira Gandhi

  2. The Shot Says:

    I support this not because of its impact today, but rather the promise it holds for tomorrow.

  3. Joshua Says:

    Great post, well written. I concur completely.

  4. The Shot Says:

    Thanks Joshua. My favorite part was the release from Merrill’s office saying:

    “Our previous experience of moving the Department of Motor Vehicles, Parks, Recreation and Tourism, and the Department of Transportation shows that restructuring agencies makes them work better.”

    My question is if those programs are working so much better, why don’t give full bureaucratic control to the executive branch of our state government.

    Wait a second. I forgot we are still stuck in 1895.

  5. Cindi Scoppe Says:

    Obviously I agree with your point, but one thing in the post has me worried. You say “The Department of Public Safety remains under the control of the Budget & Control Board,” which is news to me. What am I overlooking here?

  6. anonymous Says:

    Legal, ethics experts question the SC State Ethics Commission’s dismissal of the Governor’s brother-in-law Ethics investigation.

    http://www.beaufortgazette.com/local/story/419371.html

  7. Vince Says:

    If the Budget and Control Board is such a great concept, than why is South Carolina the only State that still has one? Is our Legislature that smart, or merely trying to cling to the past?

Leave a Reply