Comments on: Finally a Debate Worth Watching! http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:25:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Harold http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11959 Harold Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:14:34 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11959 It was all bogus started by bigheaddc.com so they are saying. It was all bogus started by bigheaddc.com so they are saying.

]]> By: Weaver http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11955 Weaver Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:08:31 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11955 "<a href="http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59442" rel="nofollow">Ron Paul excluded from debate? Not exactly</a>: Candidate claims Fox is afraid of him, but forum canceled" So is there a debate or not? “Ron Paul excluded from debate? Not exactly:
Candidate claims Fox is afraid of him, but forum canceled”

So is there a debate or not?

]]> By: Alexia http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11936 Alexia Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:26:46 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11936 Why would it be worth watching, when they all give the same answers? Why would it be worth watching, when they all give the same answers?

]]> By: crazy for Ron Paul http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11931 crazy for Ron Paul Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:27:37 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11931 I notice that the taunts posted online by pro-tyranny voices have changed over the past few months. They used to talk about their own preferred candidate, now and then; that seems to have almost stopped. Now it's just Paul-bashing -- or, even less relevantly, Paul-*supporter*-bashing. They've moved into stage 3. :-) RP 08 FTW I notice that the taunts posted online by pro-tyranny voices have changed over the past few months. They used to talk about their own preferred candidate, now and then; that seems to have almost stopped. Now it’s just Paul-bashing — or, even less relevantly, Paul-*supporter*-bashing.

They’ve moved into stage 3. :-)

RP 08 FTW

]]> By: Jake Robinson http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11927 Jake Robinson Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:53:49 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11927 It's great they got rid of Ron Paul... that man is an annyoance and so is his campaign people. He'll never get elected. Get over it. It’s great they got rid of Ron Paul… that man is an annyoance and so is his campaign people. He’ll never get elected. Get over it.

]]> By: ron http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11922 ron Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:27:55 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11922 well i can see the paul supporters had there big glass of crazy this morning! well i can see the paul supporters had there big glass of crazy this morning!

]]> By: Answering Andy on Ron Paul : The Shot! http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11921 Answering Andy on Ron Paul : The Shot! Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:00:34 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11921 [...] guy named Andy posed the following questions on our post about the debate excluding Ron Paul when we said ““I’m also looking forward to seeing how the Ron Paul crowd reacts to their [...] [...] guy named Andy posed the following questions on our post about the debate excluding Ron Paul when we said ““I’m also looking forward to seeing how the Ron Paul crowd reacts to their [...]

]]> By: NH http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11915 NH Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:14:21 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11915 Both the AP article AND this one: http://bigheaddc.com/2007/12/27/fox-news-to-host-special-gop-candidate-forum/ simply say "here is who has ACCEPTED". It never says anyplace that Ron has NOT been included. The NH GOP has never had a bad word to say about Ron. In an article in yesterday's UL, it says Rudy's campaign doesn't even KNOW about it yet...and Fergus says it's hard to get commitments. http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=All+candidates+accept+debate+offer+from+ABC%2C+WMUR&articleId=141a7c52-a168-4f70-9497-8230e7309e9e Scroll down to read it. So, the AP has its head up its butt once again. And you 2 bloggers are are assuming something that is not yet confirmed, in print, anyplace. Your wishing it to be true doesn't make it so. Both the AP article AND this one:

http://bigheaddc.com/2007/12/27/fox-news-to-host-special-gop-candidate-forum/

simply say “here is who has ACCEPTED”. It never says anyplace that Ron has NOT been included. The NH GOP has never had a bad word to say about Ron.

In an article in yesterday’s UL, it says Rudy’s campaign doesn’t even KNOW about it yet…and Fergus says it’s hard to get commitments.

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=All+candidates+accept+debate+offer+from+ABC%2C+WMUR&articleId=141a7c52-a168-4f70-9497-8230e7309e9e

Scroll down to read it.

So, the AP has its head up its butt once again.

And you 2 bloggers are are assuming something that is not yet confirmed, in print, anyplace.

Your wishing it to be true doesn’t make it so.

]]> By: Jeff http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11914 Jeff Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:28:26 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11914 And will you be answering the quality questions posted by Andy? And will you be answering the quality questions posted by Andy?

]]> By: Jeff http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11913 Jeff Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:27:31 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/finally-a-debate-worth-watching.htm#comment-11913 Go Ron Paul, that's all there is to it! Go Ron Paul, that’s all there is to it!

]]>