Comments on: Aren’t there any SC blogs without an agenda? http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:29:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: jbty http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13467 jbty Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:24:50 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13467 SChotline under Starboard's umbrella? No, no, no, it's more under the umbrella of the Howard Rich-controlled Faith in the South Carolinian Palmetto Council Group for Reform and Responsible Conservative Growth In The Sound's umbrella. SChotline under Starboard’s umbrella?

No, no, no, it’s more under the umbrella of the Howard Rich-controlled Faith in the South Carolinian Palmetto Council Group for Reform and Responsible Conservative Growth In The Sound’s umbrella.

]]> By: rick beltram http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13463 rick beltram Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:12:04 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13463 Wow! Let us focus on burying the DEMS! A bunch of cheaters at every level. Rick Beltram Wow!

Let us focus on burying the DEMS!
A bunch of cheaters at every level.

Rick Beltram

]]> By: The Shot http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13461 The Shot Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:37:40 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13461 Taft - done. Keep up the good blogging. We have been enjoying it. Taft - done. Keep up the good blogging. We have been enjoying it.

]]> By: Taft http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13460 Taft Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:47:43 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13460 Shot, Even though there are accuracy issues with this post that I won't get in to, would you mind fixing the link to TMPR? The address is taftmatney.com. Thanks, for thinking of me guys. Taft Shot,

Even though there are accuracy issues with this post that I won’t get in to, would you mind fixing the link to TMPR? The address is taftmatney.com.

Thanks, for thinking of me guys.

Taft

]]> By: Earl http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13456 Earl Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:56:50 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13456 Their spelling was all my fault. I kept them out late last night drinking. The shadowy, sinister forces that are really behind my blog were picking up the tab. (How's that guys?) Their spelling was all my fault. I kept them out late last night drinking.

The shadowy, sinister forces that are really behind my blog were picking up the tab.

(How’s that guys?)

]]> By: The Shot http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13454 The Shot Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:26:09 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13454 Dude - you're right. The post itself means nothing to our standard. It's all in the spelling. Dude - you’re right. The post itself means nothing to our standard. It’s all in the spelling.

]]> By: Joshua http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13448 Joshua Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:13:51 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13448 Dude - if you're going to blog, you have a certain responsibility to keep up a standard of quality that you are currently failing to achieve... ...the word in your headline should be "there", not "their"... I have no knowledge of the actual subject of the post (other than that "Wilson Charles" of Brooks Brothers fame, whomever he may be, appears to be a very good writer). Dude - if you’re going to blog, you have a certain responsibility to keep up a standard of quality that you are currently failing to achieve…

…the word in your headline should be “there”, not “their”…

I have no knowledge of the actual subject of the post (other than that “Wilson Charles” of Brooks Brothers fame, whomever he may be, appears to be a very good writer).

]]> By: The Shot http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13447 The Shot Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:48:36 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13447 When Mike Green went to work for Starboard. When Mike Green went to work for Starboard.

]]> By: Rob W. http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13446 Rob W. Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:38:55 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13446 When did SC Hotline fall under Starboard's umbrella? When did SC Hotline fall under Starboard’s umbrella?

]]> By: Earl http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13431 Earl Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:19:47 +0000 http://shotpolitics.com/aren%e2%80%99t-their-any-sc-blogs-without-an-agenda.htm#comment-13431 Wow ... thanks for trying to be so nice, but I really do have an agenda ... I'm out to find free beer, cheap hookers, and lots of 80s heavy metal albums. A lot of politically-employed bloggers chose that occupation because they enjoy being able to combine a hobby and their career. So it's natural that one would want to talk about something they're interested in. Just like sports fans talk about sports on their sites. People talk about what they care about. As long as I know who is saying it and what the author's connections are, I see nothing wrong with having overlapping relationships. As long as everything's fair, above board and nobody makes it personal, vicious or false, that's all that should matter. If we tried to disqualify everyone who worked in politics from blogging about it, things would be awful quiet out there. Besides, if people believe everything they see online, without a second opinion, then they need to call me. I've got this great online source for all natural male enhancement ... and for the ladies, herbal breast enhancement pills. Seriously, dude, I enjoy your site and appreciate it's contributions to the state's political blogosphere. Keep up the good work. Wow … thanks for trying to be so nice, but I really do have an agenda … I’m out to find free beer, cheap hookers, and lots of 80s heavy metal albums.

A lot of politically-employed bloggers chose that occupation because they enjoy being able to combine a hobby and their career. So it’s natural that one would want to talk about something they’re interested in.

Just like sports fans talk about sports on their sites. People talk about what they care about. As long as I know who is saying it and what the author’s connections are, I see nothing wrong with having overlapping relationships.

As long as everything’s fair, above board and nobody makes it personal, vicious or false, that’s all that should matter. If we tried to disqualify everyone who worked in politics from blogging about it, things would be awful quiet out there.

Besides, if people believe everything they see online, without a second opinion, then they need to call me. I’ve got this great online source for all natural male enhancement … and for the ladies, herbal breast enhancement pills.

Seriously, dude, I enjoy your site and appreciate it’s contributions to the state’s political blogosphere. Keep up the good work.

]]>