<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Candidacy Fueled By Anger, Hate, and now Hypocrisy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kris in AL</title>
		<link>http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12354</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris in AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12354</guid>
		<description>AGREED! If you voted against something and then you criticize your opponent for not supporting what you voted against, then that the HEIGHT OF HYPOCRASY! How could you be more hypocritical as a Republican? I thought tax cuts were THE ISSUE at the top of the list in the Party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AGREED! If you voted against something and then you criticize your opponent for not supporting what you voted against, then that the HEIGHT OF HYPOCRASY! How could you be more hypocritical as a Republican? I thought tax cuts were THE ISSUE at the top of the list in the Party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComMITTed to Romney! &#187; A Candidacy Fueled By Anger, Hate, and now Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12340</link>
		<dc:creator>ComMITTed to Romney! &#187; A Candidacy Fueled By Anger, Hate, and now Hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 02:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12340</guid>
		<description>[...] Click Here and Read the Story. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click Here and Read the Story. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supa-bleeda</title>
		<link>http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12178</link>
		<dc:creator>Supa-bleeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12178</guid>
		<description>I believe she spells that Laurin.  But it is nice to see that she is still bitter, it will keep her warm all through the winter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe she spells that Laurin.  But it is nice to see that she is still bitter, it will keep her warm all through the winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shot</title>
		<link>http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12166</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12166</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lauren. We miss you too.

WM - good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lauren. We miss you too.</p>
<p>WM - good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innocent Bystander</title>
		<link>http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12165</link>
		<dc:creator>Innocent Bystander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12165</guid>
		<description>Wow - you guys really did become what everyone assumed you would.  I remember when the website first came out, some talked as though it was to pose as an un-biased site until just before the primary when unfounded attacks would fly at the candidate that most endangered Warren's client.
Before you say it - yes, we know - you've said before that you are biased towards Romney, but you only say that because you were outed after sending
an email on behalf of the Romney campaign and Ambinder fired you.  

But now it's obvious you're more than a site that Tim or Wesley or whoever the hell is on computer duty for the day maintains in their spare time blah blah blah.  The deafening silence after Romney's come-from-ahead defeats in IA and NH, followed by the oh-so-clever "Word!" video postings and then the kind of schizophrenic rambling in this post makes it pretty obvious what your intentions are.  

The kicker is, however, no one really gives a crap.  I don't want to get into a tit-for-tat about your hits and how extremely popular you are and how you beat SCHotline and Palmetto Scoop eight out of seven days a week.  The
bottom line is, you guys shopped the candidates.  You made some money on
one, but in the end, you picked the wrong guy.  I'm sure you were thinking
your client had a real shot at this thing.  But, after McCain's implosion and then his resurgence accompanied by the "how the hell are we losing to this moron" view of Huckabee, it truly appears you are all a bunch of scorned women out to say your meanest of mean, mean, mean things about the guys who really have a shot now.  

P.S. Again, I know your claim is that this is just a side-project you do in your spare time when you're not dating hot women, fetching Terry's coffee or holding a Romney sign, but that doesn't mean your writing should suck.  

"2000 seems like ages ago, doesn't?" Is that the new way of saying "NOT" after something when you really don't mean it?  So, you're saying 2000 DOESN'T seem like ages ago?

"John McCain one again feel into obscurity."  I mean ... I don't even know what to say.

P.S.S. The anger talk is amusing.  Outside the Columbia bubble, everyone following this race thinks he's funnier than hell and is the most
light-hearted.  The only anger or hatred we've seen was the hilarious explanations from Romney about medals and delegate counts and stuff like
that while he was masking what clearly was some discomfort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow - you guys really did become what everyone assumed you would.  I remember when the website first came out, some talked as though it was to pose as an un-biased site until just before the primary when unfounded attacks would fly at the candidate that most endangered Warren&#8217;s client.<br />
Before you say it - yes, we know - you&#8217;ve said before that you are biased towards Romney, but you only say that because you were outed after sending<br />
an email on behalf of the Romney campaign and Ambinder fired you.  </p>
<p>But now it&#8217;s obvious you&#8217;re more than a site that Tim or Wesley or whoever the hell is on computer duty for the day maintains in their spare time blah blah blah.  The deafening silence after Romney&#8217;s come-from-ahead defeats in IA and NH, followed by the oh-so-clever &#8220;Word!&#8221; video postings and then the kind of schizophrenic rambling in this post makes it pretty obvious what your intentions are.  </p>
<p>The kicker is, however, no one really gives a crap.  I don&#8217;t want to get into a tit-for-tat about your hits and how extremely popular you are and how you beat SCHotline and Palmetto Scoop eight out of seven days a week.  The<br />
bottom line is, you guys shopped the candidates.  You made some money on<br />
one, but in the end, you picked the wrong guy.  I&#8217;m sure you were thinking<br />
your client had a real shot at this thing.  But, after McCain&#8217;s implosion and then his resurgence accompanied by the &#8220;how the hell are we losing to this moron&#8221; view of Huckabee, it truly appears you are all a bunch of scorned women out to say your meanest of mean, mean, mean things about the guys who really have a shot now.  </p>
<p>P.S. Again, I know your claim is that this is just a side-project you do in your spare time when you&#8217;re not dating hot women, fetching Terry&#8217;s coffee or holding a Romney sign, but that doesn&#8217;t mean your writing should suck.  </p>
<p>&#8220;2000 seems like ages ago, doesn&#8217;t?&#8221; Is that the new way of saying &#8220;NOT&#8221; after something when you really don&#8217;t mean it?  So, you&#8217;re saying 2000 DOESN&#8217;T seem like ages ago?</p>
<p>&#8220;John McCain one again feel into obscurity.&#8221;  I mean &#8230; I don&#8217;t even know what to say.</p>
<p>P.S.S. The anger talk is amusing.  Outside the Columbia bubble, everyone following this race thinks he&#8217;s funnier than hell and is the most<br />
light-hearted.  The only anger or hatred we&#8217;ve seen was the hilarious explanations from Romney about medals and delegate counts and stuff like<br />
that while he was masking what clearly was some discomfort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Heritage Times &#187; SC&#8217;s The Shot on McCain</title>
		<link>http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12151</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Heritage Times &#187; SC&#8217;s The Shot on McCain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12151</guid>
		<description>[...] A Candidacy Fueled By Anger, Hate, and now Hypocrisy John McCain scares us…truly. He is so consumed with hate and anger that he is self-destructive, which begs the question – what else would John McCain destroy? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Candidacy Fueled By Anger, Hate, and now Hypocrisy John McCain scares us…truly. He is so consumed with hate and anger that he is self-destructive, which begs the question – what else would John McCain destroy? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WM</title>
		<link>http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12148</link>
		<dc:creator>WM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shotpolitics.com/a-candidacy-fueled-by-anger-hate-and-now-hypocrisy.htm#comment-12148</guid>
		<description>This article is right on.  You've convinced me to vote Fred Thompson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is right on.  You&#8217;ve convinced me to vote Fred Thompson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
